A Peanut Butter You've Never Heard Of Beat Skippy, Jif, and Justin's
We graded every nut butter in our database, and the winner isn't a household name — it's Crazy Richard's Creamy Natural Peanut Butter, whose entire ingredient list is one word: peanuts. It beat Skippy, Justin's, and the store brands not by doing more, but by adding nothing. Skippy — the jar most people picture when they hear "peanut butter" — came last, because it takes the same nut and adds sugar and palm oil. The lesson of the whole category fits on one line: in peanut butter, the shortest label wins.
The verdict, and the receipts
This isn't a hot take — it's what falls out of the data when you score every jar on the same six dimensions (protein, ingredients, added sugar, sodium, saturated fat, fiber) and rank them. Here is the full list, pulled live from the same grades that power the nut & seed butter report card, so it can't drift from what we actually scored:
- Crazy Richard's Creamy Natural Peanut Butter — Labelgrade A- (86/100)
winner
one ingredient — just the nut, nothing added - Justin's Classic Almond Butter — Labelgrade B+ (84/100)
2 ingredients — adds palm oil - 365 Everyday Value Organic Creamy Peanut Butter — Labelgrade B+ (81/100)
one ingredient — just the nut, nothing added - MaraNatha Creamy Almond Butter — Labelgrade B (79/100)
4 ingredients — adds added sugar + palm oil - Justin's Classic Peanut Butter — Labelgrade B (77/100)
2 ingredients — adds palm oil - Peanut Butter & Co. Smooth Operator Creamy Peanut Butter — Labelgrade B- (74/100)
4 ingredients — adds added sugar + palm oil - Skippy Creamy Peanut Butter — Labelgrade B- (72/100)
last place
4 ingredients — adds added sugar + palm oil
Grades from USDA FoodData Central nutrition data, scored on the Labelgrade methodology. Ranking and hooks are generated from the live product records, not hand-typed — when a jar is reformulated, this list updates with it.
What the winner did differently: nothing
Turn Crazy Richard's's jar over and the ingredient line is a single word — peanuts. No sugar, no palm oil, no salt, no stabilizers; nothing the peanuts didn't bring themselves. That's the entire story of why it lands an A- (86/100) and tops the category. A clean label isn't an aesthetic here — it shows up directly in the numbers:
- 0 mg sodium. Conventional jars add salt; this one doesn't, so it earns a perfect score on the sodium dimension. Over a daily habit, that's a real difference.
- No added sugar. The 2 g of sugars per serving are the peanuts' own — there's no cane syrup or sugar in the recipe to push the sugar load up.
- The most protein in the set. Because the jar isn't diluted with oil and sweetener, you get a little more peanut — and therefore a little more protein — per spoonful than a spread that's part palm oil and sugar.
The one honest knock is saturated fat, which keeps it at an A- rather than a straight A — but that's a property of peanuts themselves (they naturally carry a couple of grams), not a recipe flaw. There is nothing on the ingredient line to apologize for. If your only question is "which peanut butter has the least added to it," this is the answer.
Why Skippy lost — and why it's still fine
Skippy's ingredient list explains its B- (72/100) in four words: roasted peanuts, sugar, palm oil, salt. The peanuts still do the heavy lifting — protein density holds up fine — but every add-in quietly costs a dimension. The sugar gets scored as added rather than natural. The palm oil stacks onto the peanuts' own saturated fat, which becomes the weakest mark on the jar. The salt puts sodium where a clean jar reads zero. None of those are alarming on their own; together, they're the gap between an A and a B-.
Here's the part the David-vs-Goliath framing can obscure, so let's be plain about it: a B- is not a bad grade, and Skippy is not bad for you. In our system a B- means "fine in moderation," not "avoid." Skippy is still real peanuts, still a legitimate source of protein and mostly-unsaturated fat, and still a perfectly reasonable thing to put on toast. The sugar, palm oil, and salt aren't there by accident or neglect — they're what make it sweet, smooth, and no-stir straight from the pantry, which is exactly what a lot of people want. That convenience is a genuine preference, not a moral failing. The honest critique isn't of the peanuts or the people who buy it; it's that the front of the jar sells "peanut butter" while the back of the jar is doing three extra things the winner simply doesn't need to do.
And notice the pattern in the middle of the list: the jars that creep up the ranking are the ones that stop adding things. Justin's Classic Almond Butter and the store-brand organic jar climb precisely because they drop the sugar and the salt. It's the same lesson from the other direction.
The practical takeaway: read the label, then learn to love the stir
You don't need our grades to win this one in the aisle — you need the back of the jar. The healthiest peanut butter is the one with the fewest things in it, ideally just "peanuts" (an "and salt" is a minor footnote). Skip the front-of-pack health halo; the ingredient list is where the truth is.
The one thing that scares people off natural peanut butter is the layer of oil on top — and that layer is the feature, not a defect. With no palm oil or stabilizer in the jar, the natural peanut oil rises to the top. Stir it back in (store the jar upside down for a day first and it mixes easier), then keep it in the fridge. Do not pour the oil off — it's the healthy unsaturated fat you paid for, and tipping it out just leaves a dry spread. A jar that separates is simply a jar with nothing extra holding it together. That's the whole trade: thirty seconds of stirring in exchange for the cleanest label on the shelf.
Want the full breakdown of every jar, dimension by dimension? The nut & seed butter report card grades the whole category A–F, and the methodology page shows exactly how the six scores combine. Or read the two ends of the spectrum side by side: the one-ingredient winner and the supermarket standard it beat.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is natural peanut butter actually better than Skippy or Jif?
Nutritionally, yes — and the gap is entirely about what gets added, not the peanuts. A just-peanuts jar has no added sugar, no palm oil, and typically zero sodium. Conventional spreads add all three to make a sweet, no-stir, shelf-stable product. On our methodology that's the whole difference between an A-range grade and a B-. The trade-off is real but small: natural peanut butter separates and needs stirring, and it's a touch less sweet. If you want the cleanest label, switch. If you specifically want the smooth, sweet, no-stir texture, the conventional jar is still a real protein source — just mind the portion.
What's actually wrong with a little sugar and palm oil in peanut butter?
Individually, not much — and that's the honest answer. The teaspoon of sugar in a serving is small, and palm oil is a stabilizer, not a toxin. The issue is that they each cost a point on a label that didn't need them. The added sugar gets scored as added (not the peanuts' own), and the palm oil pushes saturated fat up, which is the single weakest dimension on most conventional jars. Stack those small costs together and you go from an A to a B-. None of it makes the product bad; it just means a plain-peanuts jar is the same food without the additions.
Is Skippy bad for you?
No. Skippy is a legitimate source of protein and mostly-unsaturated fat — roasted peanuts are still the first and largest ingredient. Its B- isn't a warning label; in our system a B- means "fine in moderation," not "avoid." It scores lower than a single-ingredient jar because it adds sugar, palm oil, and salt, which cost it on the sugar, saturated-fat, and sodium dimensions. The bigger day-to-day variable for any peanut butter is portion: it's calorie-dense and easy to over-scoop. A level 2-tablespoon serving of Skippy is a perfectly reasonable snack.
Why does natural peanut butter have oil floating on top — is the jar bad?
That oil layer is a sign the jar is doing it right, not a defect. With nothing added to bind it — no palm oil, no stabilizers — the natural peanut oil rises to the top. Stir it back in (storing the jar upside down for a day first makes it easier), then refrigerate to keep it mixed. Don't pour the oil off: it's the healthy unsaturated fat you paid for, and tipping it out just leaves the spread dry. Separation is the feature, not the flaw — it's literally the look of a label with nothing extra in it.
How is the nut butter grade calculated?
Each jar is scored on six dimensions from its USDA nutrition data — protein density, ingredient quality, added sugar, sodium, saturated fat, and fiber — then blended into one 0–100 score and an A–F letter. The weighting is protein 25%, ingredients 22%, saturated fat 18%, sodium 15%, sugar 12%, fiber 8%. Because the inputs are public USDA data, the ranking is reproducible, and the list on this page is pulled live from the same grades, so it can't drift from the report card. Full details are on the methodology page.
Does the most expensive or best-known brand win?
No — and that's the point of this piece. The winner here is a one-ingredient jar from a brand most people have never heard of, and it beat three household names. Price and shelf fame don't enter the score at all; only the label and the nutrition do. The practical takeaway is simpler than any brand loyalty: in nut butter, turn the jar over and read the ingredient list. The shortest one usually wins.